Politics

Ankara watched Israel’s Iran attack: 200 jets in 6 waves, local support

Ankara closely monitored Israel’s attack on Iran: nearly 200 aircraft in 6 Waves. An apartment in Tehran, where a target was located, was struck by a jet, as shown in the image, indicating Israel’s intelligence support from within Iran. (Photo: Fatemeh Bahrami/AA)

Israeli warplanes launched a major airstrike on Iran in the early hours of June 13. The attack targeted military and nuclear facilities, killing Iran’s Chief of General Staff Mohammad Bagheri, Revolutionary Guards Commander Hossein Salami, and 6 scientists involved in Iran’s nuclear program. The Natanz nuclear reactor was also hit. Reports claim Airospace Forces Commander Amir Ali Hajizadeh was killed as well.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared the attacks would continue “as long as necessary.”
Türkiye condemned the attack “in the strongest terms.” Sending condolences to Iran because of the loss of lives, President Tayyip Erdoğan said, “Netanyahu and his gang of massacres” must be stopped.
Turkish Foreign Ministry stated that this “provocation” was a “clear violation of international law,” serves Israel’s “strategic destabilization policy in the region”. Ministry urged Israel to immediately halt its “aggressive actions that could lead to larger conflicts” and called on the international community to “act urgently” to prevent the war from escalating.
Turkish Ministry of National Defense monitored the attack from start to finish, with a source stating that “all necessary measures were taken.”

200 aircraft in 6 waves

According to sources who spoke to YetkinReport anonymously, Ankara tracked Israel’s attack on Iran minute-by-minute starting from midnight on June 12. Ankara’s monitoring and assessments can be summarized as follows:
• The first Israeli aircraft took off toward Iran at around 1 a.m. on June 13, followed shortly by a second wave.
• After the first two waves advanced through Syrian airspace and then retreated, Ankara’s crisis center assessed this as a “deception operation,” predicting the main attack was imminent. The primary assault followed shortly after.
• The first reports of explosions in Iran emerged around 4 a.m. Israeli jets utilized Syrian and Iraqi airspace during the attack.
• According to the crisis center, Israel’s operation, codenamed “Rising Lion,” involved nearly 200 aircraft in 6 waves.

Local intel Support

Ankara’s technical assessments indicate Israel received internal support within Iran for targeting:
• The Chief of General Staff, Revolutionary Guards Commander, and six nuclear scientists were killed at their locations. Some were struck in specific apartments, reminiscent of Israel’s operation to kill Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in a Revolutionary Guards guesthouse in Tehran.
• Such an operation would be impossible without intelligence support from within Iran. Precise confirmation of targets’ locations and laser designation for airstrikes was required.
• This suggests Israel, likely through MOSSAD or other means, had high-level intelligence support within Iran. The Iranian air defense system’s failure to respond to the airstrikes indicates it was neutralized through electronic warfare, possibly with external assistance.
Notably, two days before the attack, the opposition group People’s Mujahedin of Iran revealed details of a new nuclear program Iran allegedly concealed from the U.S.

Objective: Regime Change

Ankara believes the attack’s goal extends beyond destroying Iran’s nuclear program or forcing compliance with U.S. demands. The assessment is as follows:
• Israel, backed by Zionist lobbies, seeks to leverage the support it received during the Gaza conflict from the U.S. and some Western European countries for its Iran strategy. This opportunity aligns with the Trump administration’s desire to shift focus from the Middle East to the Pacific and counter China.
• No country in the Middle East is likely to go beyond political condemnations or diplomatic efforts to stop Israel’s attack on Iran. Saudi Arabia and Gulf states, despite public criticism, are privately content with Iran’s weakening, especially after the regime change in Syria.
• Israel’s targeted killing of 6 nuclear scientists and strikes on facilities like Natanz cannot fully dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, as key facilities are 50-60 meters underground, with only surface structures hit. These strikes aim to demoralize the public and erode trust in the regime. The killings of the Chief of General Staff and the Revolutionary Guards Commander directly target the regime.
Thus, the attack’s primary objective appears to be destabilizing Iran’s Islamic Republic regime. Ankara estimates that if Iran does not comply with U.S. demands, the U.S. may intervene directly. Indeed, Trump has threatened that “subsequent attacks will be more severe” if Iran does not reach an agreement.

Murat Yetkin

Journalist-Writer

Recent Posts

Turkish Defense Ministry on high alert against migration risk from Iran

Turkish National Defense Minister Yaşar Güler said on June 18 that, “Due to recent events…

3 days ago

Five Lessons from Israel’s strike on Iran, one is about Türkiye

At times, history compresses into weeks, and some rare nights carry the burden of decades.…

7 days ago

Proving it can disrupt the game if not invited: unseen power of Türkiye

In geopolitics, power is no longer measured solely by having a seat at the table,…

3 weeks ago

Pro-gov’t paper Yeni Şafak slams Turkish economy: an anti-Şimşek op

The front page of the Yeni Şafak newspaper on May 26 surprised those who saw…

4 weeks ago

US Ambassador Barrack: Syria will not be divided, no new Sykes-Picot

US Ambassador to Ankara Thomas Barrack made an important statement on his “X” account in…

4 weeks ago

Özel to Erdoğan: “You are a local dictator. You will leave as you came.”

“You are not a global leader, you are a local dictator,” Turkish main opposition Republican…

1 month ago