Politics

Former Soviet countries’ dialogue in NATO-member neighbour

President Erdoğan addressed the delegations of Russia and Ukraine before the political dialogue meeting held in Istanbul on March 29. (Photo: Twitter/Directorate of Communications)

The second high-level political meeting between Russia and Ukraine was held today, March 29, in Istanbul. The first meeting after Russia’s offensive on Ukraine started on February 23 was held in Turkey’s Antalya between Russian and Ukrainian Foreign Ministers Sergey Lavrov and Dimitro Kuleba on March 10. President Tayyip Erdoğan and Minister of Foreign Affairs Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu have adopted a different understanding and effort than before so that the war will end and that it will not spread and engulf Turkey. A neighbouring country that became a NATO member 70 years ago against the Soviet threat puts an effort to end the war between the two largest republics of the Soviet Union, which collapsed thirty years ago.

History plays unexpected tricks on countries and people.

Let’s put it another way: Will the two largest republics of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, make peace with the intervention of their NATO-member neighbour Turkey?

The Ukraine Crisis has brought Turkey to the fore in the diplomatic scene, but there is also a geostrategic dimension: Turkey’s weight will be heavier in the post-crisis political equations.

Erdoğan walks without stepping on Putin’s feet

Erdoğan launched the Russia-Ukraine meetings held at the Presidential office in İstanbul’s Dolmabahçe Palace before taking off for the Uzbekistan visit. “The world is waiting for good news from you,” he told the negotiating parties, emphasizing the word “facilitator” in his speech to describe Turkey’s role, not “mediation”.

He knows that the word “mediation” offends Russian President Vladimir Putin. Many leaders aspire to this role, from French President Emmanuel Macron to Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. This time, Erdoğan also praised the efforts of Turkish Foreign Minister Çavuşoğlu, as well as the Minister of National Defense Hulusi Akar and his Chief (and I think the only real one) Chief Advisor, İbrahim Kalın. But it is clear that his very special relations with Putin made this complex diplomacy possible.

During the July 15, 2016 coup attempt, Putin offered Erdoğan the solidarity he expected from the United States and Western Europe. Now he is trying to provide Putin with a political exit from the war without disturbing the Russian leader and breaking Ukraine’s trust. Ukraine’s willingness to see Turkey among the guarantors of the agreement in case of peace shows this.

Is a federative Ukraine a possible outcome?

Çavuşoğlu said that “progress has been made”. His words were not in rhetoric. Russia has already said that it will cease fire on the cities of Kyiv and Chernihiv unless it comes from the opposite side to “facilitate dialogue”. Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelensky said he believed there wera some positive signd though they cannot silence the sirens yet. US President Joe Biden said he has no trust in Russia but they were closely watching the talks in Turkey.

If the talks continue at this pace, it is possible to move on to a comprehensive ceasefire and peace talks.

According to the information published in the international media, Ukraine will guarantee not to have nuclear weapons and that it will not be a member of NATO; even though it will not be a member of the European Union, it will be able to establish special relations. Zelensky has already said that they can accept these conditions.

It seems not likely for Russia to give away Crimea, which it annexed in 2014, and the Luhansk and Donetsk regions, as Putin recognized their independence as republics. However, according to the information we obtained from the sources close to the matter, some formulas are on the table both for the continuation of Russian influence in this region and for the nominal protection of Ukraine’s territorial integrity. These include Ukraine’s transition from a unitary structure to a federation structure and, perhaps, granting autonomy to Luhansk and Donetsk, if not Crimea.

Let’s hope Turkey’s efforts will bring results; the fire of war can be extinguished before it spreads and grows.

Murat Yetkin

Journalist-Writer

Recent Posts

A call for stability and reconstruction in the Middle East

By Mehmet Öğütçü and Rainer Geiger The Middle East, scarred by years of political instability…

2 days ago

The US Military once again defies Trump on Syria

The US Military once again defies Trump on Syria. The Pentagon is pushing back against…

2 days ago

New Syria: Unified army, reconstruction, constitution, and Türkiye’s role

Assad is gone, but I believe toughest challenge for Syria is just beginning. Israel has…

3 days ago

“Hun be xer Hatîn”: How three words signal Türkiye’s Kurdish policy shift

The Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and Kurdish-issue focused DEM Party continue to confound their adversaries…

4 days ago

Syria in transition: Power shifts, promises, and pitfalls

Intelligence suggests that the operation to overthrow Assad's regime in Syria was meticulously planned for…

7 days ago

The vicious cycle of poverty and violence in the Islamic World

As a diplomat, businessman, and traveler, I have visited 135 countries. In many of them,…

7 days ago