Yetkin Report

  • Türkçe
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Life
  • Writers
  • Archive
  • Contact

Erdoğan’s wrong depiction of history of Turkish intelligence

by Murat Yetkin / 30 July 2020, Thursday / Published in Politics
Turkish intelligence chief Hakan Fidan presents a model of the new MİT headquarters in Istanbul to President Erdoğan. (Photo: Turkish Presidencey)

 A sentence from President Tayyip Erdoğan’s speech on the occasion of the opening of the National Intelligence Organization’s new building in Istanbul’s neighborhood of Maslak on July 28 is a distortion of history that is hard to digest. In his speech, the President did not mention the founder of Turkey’s first central foreign intelligence structure, the leader of our War of Independence, the founder of our Republic, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Nor did he mention Marshall Fevzi Çakmak who organized the National Security Services (MAH) that preceded MİT. The only name he mentioned was Sultan Abdul Hamid II (the 34th Sultan, 1842-1918).  

According to Erdoğan, “Thanks to the deceased Abdul Hamid Han’s powerful intelligence network and diplomatic genius, the country survived several misfortunes without sparing a bullet, a fact that is explained lengthwise in history books.”    

Whichever book that is, I would very much like to read it. Since history books state that during his 33-year long reign, twice as much land as today’s Turkish territory – which Atatürk and the heroes of the War of Independence protected – were lost. That is, Sultan Abdul Hamid II lost 1.5 million kilometers of land. 

Erdoğan’s Security and Foreign Policy Chief Advisor and spokesperson İbrahim Kalın is highly knowledgeable of these matters. This makes me think Kalın no longer reads these texts of Erdoğan’s speeches.

Cyprus, Crete, Kars, Ardahan, Pleven

History books state that Abdul Hamid II left Cyprus – Turkey’s most important foreign policy issue, which remains unresolved – to the United Kingdom without firing a bullet. At the end of the 1877-78 Russo-Turkish War, the Treaty of San Stefano was signed in today’s neighborhood of Yeşilköy in Istanbul. The Russian army had come as close as Yeşilköy, and Britain threatened the Russians with the launching of a war to force them to withdraw and refrain from entering the Ottoman Empire’s capital city. As a result of this, Cyprus was granted to Britain without sparring a bullet. Under a surrender agreement, Abdul Hamid gave the protectorate of all Orthodox communities within the Ottoman territory to Russia. Following this, Armenian nationalism surged. The War of 1877-78 did not only cause the loss of the Balkans, my late grandfather’s hometown Razgrad, Pleven and Skopje, but Kars, Ardahan, Batumi, Artvin, Doğubayazıt and Eleşkirt in the east were also left to the Russians. In addition to that, the Ottoman Empire had to pay war compensation. 

Due his targeting of “domestic enemies” rather than “foreign enemies” and the cruelty of his Hamidiye Regiments, Abdul Hamid II bears his share of responsibility for the pains that linger today with regards to the Armenian and Kurdish issues. Crete, another pearl of the Eastern Mediterranean, was also lost during the reign of Abdul Hamid II. The Jewish settlements in Palestine were first allowed during the Abdul Hamid era, which Erdoğan lauds as an era of “diplomatic genius.” The city Tel Aviv, which was later to be declared as of Israel’s capital, was a mass housing project that was launched during the time of Abdul Hamid.

On his intelligence genius

Perhaps the text about Abdul Hamid II would be removed from the MİT website because I have written about it. Nevertheless, let us read about Abdul Hamid’s ability to gather intelligence – which our president admires – through MİT’s own history: 

“Abdul Hamid II and the Yıldız (*) Intelligence Organization: Around the end of the 19th century, state intelligence was improved, but it became a tool that served personal interests. In his memoires, [Abdul Hamit] said “If foreign states were able to place people who would serve them, to [Ottoman] positions such as vizier and grand vizier, then the state wouldn’t be safe. I decided, with this thought in mind, to establish an intelligence organization that directly reports to me. That is what my domestic enemies call ‘informing or spying organization’. That was Abdul Hamit’s own explanation as to why he needed the organization. Another matter Abdul Hamid II expected from his intelligence staff was for them to “reveal possible conspiracies against his own throne.”  (*Yıldız was Abdul Hamid’s Palace in Beşiktaş neighborhood of Istanbul.)

This is the truth: What Abdul Hamid II established, in MİT terms, the Yıldız Intelligence Organization, was not a national institution. Rather, it was a personal intelligence organization. Abdul Hamit II was toppled by the Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa (Special Organization), which was formed by the İttihat ve Terakki (The Committee/Party of Union and Progress, a reform movement in Ottoman times) as an ideological organization. The leader who established the first national intelligence organization in Turkey was Atatürk, whom Erdoğan did not feel the need to mention.  
This is bewildering, isn’t it?

(Translated by Duvar English).

Yeni yazılardan haberdar olun! Lütfen aboneliğinizi güncelleyin.

İstenmeyen posta göndermiyoruz! Daha fazla bilgi için gizlilik politikamızı okuyun.

Aboneliğinizi onaylamak için gelen veya istenmeyen posta kutunuzu kontrol edin.

What you can read next

Globalization and Coronavirus: The End of Geography?
The next stress test in US-Turkish ties: coming soon
USA’s Türkiye dilemma; Türkiye’s USA dilemma
  • Five Lessons from Israel’s strike on Iran, one is about Türkiye14 June 2025
  • Ankara watched Israel’s Iran attack: 200 jets in 6 waves, local support13 June 2025
  • Proving it can disrupt the game if not invited: unseen power of Türkiye28 May 2025
  • Pro-gov’t paper Yeni Şafak slams Turkish economy: an anti-Şimşek op27 May 2025
  • US Ambassador Barrack: Syria will not be divided, no new Sykes-Picot26 May 2025
  • Özel to Erdoğan: “You are a local dictator. You will leave as you came.”20 May 2025
  • UK-Türkiye: More than just a free trade agreement on the horizon20 May 2025
  • Towards a simultaneous solution to Ukraine, Syria and the Kurdish issues16 May 2025
  • The PKK’s decision to dissolve and questions to the Turkish government13 May 2025
  • Turkish public awareness of the disbanding of the PKK is low: survey13 May 2025
Search the news archive...

Politics

Economy

Life

Writers

Archive

Türkçe

About

Impressum

FAQ

Advertising

Contact

Made with ♥ by tbtcreative.com © 2022 yetkinreport.com All rights reserved.

Yetkin Report     ·      Help     ·      User Agreement     ·      Legal

TOP