Yetkin Report

  • Türkçe
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Life
  • Writers
  • Archive
  • Contact

HDP closure case in Turkey: is this a democracy reform?

by Murat Yetkin / 17 March 2021, Wednesday / Published in Politics
The HDP deputies faced the closure case hours after protesting one of their colleagues’ removal from the parliament with the government block votes. (Photo: Twitter/HDP)

Hours after the removal of one of its MPs, Ömer Faruk Gergerlioğlu from the parliament on March 17, the Chief Prosecutor of the Supreme Court of Appeals filed a lawsuit for the closure of the Kurdish-problem-focused Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP). In the indictment he sent to the Constitutional Court, the Chief Prosecutor Bekir Şahin claimed that the HDP “aims to destroy and eliminate the indivisible unity of the state with its nation”. The HDP closure case and the removal of Gergerlioğlu, renowned for bringing human rights issues to the Parliament, followed the law and democratization package announced by President Tayyip Erdoğan under the title of Human Rights Action Plan on March 2. Saying that, “Turkey’s place is in the European Union”, Erdoğan had signaled to the West about moves to upgrade the quality of democracy.

Like a present for the MHP Congress

Another importance of the closure case in terms of timing is that it was opened on the eve of the Congress of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) on March 18, whose leader Devlet Bahçeli is Erdoğan’s election ally and de facto government partner. Bahçeli has been asking for the closure of the HDP for a while claiming that it was the legal front of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), waging a bloody campaign in Turkey for nearly four decades.
However, this demand led to the reaction of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) Deputy Chairman Numan Kurtulmuş, who opposed a method such as closing the party. With the closure case filed against the HDP, Bahçeli is going to the 18 March congress as the leader who had what he said.

Erdoğan shooting himself in the reform foot

The closure file against the HDP does not only mean to attempt to push the third biggest party in the Turkish parliament out of politics through non-political ways. At the same time, it overshadows Erdoğan’s reform promises to domestic and international parties. Erdoğan, who has already received answers to his promises such as “Nice words but let’s see the concrete steps” will have a harder time facing the criticisms from both the USA and the EU that he wants to fix the gap.
The lawsuit undermines the reforms that Erdoğan has vowed for. Although the President, who will also chair the AK Party Congress on March 24, may say “it’s an act of the independent judiciary”, but the perception inside and outside Turkey will be that the action is not independent of him. The HDP’s closure case also signals that the politics will get even tougher.

The way that you don’t want to be treated

Perhaps, the HDP closure case will be a relief for the MHP wing of the AKP-MHP’s “People’s Alliance” ahead of their congress. But it is doubtful that all the AKP who will convene at the Congress on March 24 will be happy. The political Islamist “National Vision” tradition where the AKP is sourcing from is a political movement that has suffered a lot from the closure of their successive parties on the accusation of “anti-secularism”. The AKP itself was subject to a closure case, even though it was in power in 2008 indicted to be “a center of anti-secular actions” and was fined. The HDP is likewise a political movement whose predecessors were shut down repeatedly on accusations of “separatism”.
Now the AK Party is in a position to treating its political opponents the way that it wouldn’t want to be treated.

The opposition and the Constitutional Court

The stance of the opposition front is of importance here. Lead by the center-left Republican People’s Party (CHP) and the center-right Good Party’s (GP) “Nation Alliance” will the opposition stand against the closure case for the sake of pluralist democracy in Turkey? The issue is not only the closure case against the HDP. It’s also relapse of the bad habits of disabling political rivals by non-political means.
Of course, in terms of pluralist democracy and the rule of law, the biggest responsibility falls on the shoulders of the Constitutional Court. The Court had given a good test in 2008, albeit by one vote difference.
Let’s see if it can give it now.

Yeni yazılardan haberdar olun! Lütfen aboneliğinizi güncelleyin.

İstenmeyen posta göndermiyoruz! Daha fazla bilgi için gizlilik politikamızı okuyun.

Aboneliğinizi onaylamak için gelen veya istenmeyen posta kutunuzu kontrol edin.

Tagged under: Kurdish, Murat Yetkin, party closure

What you can read next

The EU once again: U-Turn or tactical move?
Government must allow Unions to fight against Corona
The 2nd “hood Incident” with Türkiye and the YPG dilemma of the USA
  • Rising new fascism aims to push the lower-class lower23 November 2023
  • Establishing a balanced “Give-and-Take” in energy diplomacy of Türkiye23 November 2023
  • Gaza ceasefire: Egypt and Qatar mediated, Türkiye unmentioned22 November 2023
  • Erdoğan is giving up 50+1 percent: MHP or lifetime presidency?20 November 2023
  • Erdoğan slammed Scholz in Berlin, but what he have gained?18 November 2023
  • Ankara eyes German OK for Eurofighters ahead of Erdoğan’s visit17 November 2023
  • Turkish parliament postponed Sweden’s NATO accession deliberations16 November 2023
  • 27 patients from Gaza transferred to Türkiye for treatment16 November 2023
  • On the verge of another crisis: Erdoğan and Scholz’s duel over Israel16 November 2023
  • The Islamic countries shout out loud, but Israel pays no attention. Why?13 November 2023
Search the news archive...

Politics

Economy

Life

Writers

Archive

Türkçe

About

Impressum

FAQ

Advertising

Contact

Made with ♥ by tbtcreative.com © 2022 yetkinreport.com All rights reserved.

Yetkin Report     ·      Help     ·      User Agreement     ·      Legal

TOP